Read this now

Every so often, I come across a post by another blogger that's just so perfect that I can only stand by in envy, wishing I had thought of the argument first. So it is with this article by Canadian Cynic on why one particular creationist canard, the demand for "direct observation," may not be as smart a gambit as they think it is. Better yet, it's labeled as "Part 1 in the serial adventures of John Q. Creation." Please, go and read it. I can't wait for part 2.