Read this now
Every so often, I come across a post by another blogger that's just so perfect that I can only stand by in envy, wishing I had thought of the argument first. So it is with this article by Canadian Cynic on why one particular creationist canard, the demand for "direct observation," may not be as smart a gambit as they think it is. Better yet, it's labeled as "Part 1 in the serial adventures of John Q. Creation." Please, go and read it. I can't wait for part 2.
Thanks for sharing that link!ReplyDelete
This would make a great addition to the upcoming Skeptics' Circle.ReplyDelete
Canadian Cynic might even make a good future host for the Skeptics' Circle.ReplyDelete